Skip to content
Solving the border crisis: Letters
Solving the border crisis: Letters
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

 

Re “Should the United States have open borders?”

I was fascinated to read the arguments of both Sal Rodriguez and Susan Shelley … because Rodriguez’s position isn’t really “open borders” at all. He argues it should be easier for well-intentioned immigrants to come to the U.S. without having to navigate such a complicated series of steps for becoming legal citizens or endure a grueling process just to gain entry into the country, but he notes there still should be a process, including a basic vetting. That’s not all that far removed from what we have now.  Shelley, on the other hand, interpreted the same “open borders” phrase much more literally, as if the idea would be to prop the gates open with sticks and re-assign Border Patrol officers to a different law enforcement agency. And so, the debate really was reduced to apples vs. oranges. Both writers make sense on some aspects, but also are somewhat unrealistic about others. The result was an interesting read but, in my opinion, not much help in terms of solving our current border crisis.

— Bob Cunningham, Cherry Valley

 

Global warming

Re “Coal, gas power plants may get new limits” (May 12):

Thankfully, the EPA’s new regulations for fossil-fueled electricity generation preserve the chance to reach the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions science tells us are needed to maintain a climate where we all can thrive. It won’t be easy or cheap. But, failure is not an option. In 10 years, I would much rather discover we’ve spent a fraction of a percent of our GDP more than necessary to preserve a livable planet (while improving our health, security and extending our lifespan) than find that we just missed keeping global warming to a level that lets our kids and grandkids have a climate where they can enjoy life and prosper.

— Tom Hazelleaf, Seal Beach

 

White supremacy

Re:  “Biden: Racial progress facing sinister forces” (May 14):

Once again, President Biden has repeated that endless lie, stating that Donald Trump said “there are fine people on both sides” of White supremacy, both for and against. Trump said no such thing. He merely said there are fine people on both sides of the question of whether or not to remove statues of Confederate heroes. But I guess as long as it makes the former president look bad, it is OK to continually repeat this lie.

— Marc Russell, Los Angeles